|
Channing Memorial Church
Year of Decision 2006-2007
Where We Are at the Half Way Point
~
What We Have Learned Thus Far
As of March 1, 2007
|
|
Click Here for pdf version of this document for easy
printing.
- Ministry.
- We know what the Congregation values about Channing.
- Being part of a loving, caring community.
- Spirituality.
- Respect for a diversity of beliefs.
- The freedom to believe.
- Fellowship.
- Service to others.
- We know why people come to Channing.
- Spirituality / Inspiration.
- Community / Caring / Fellowship.
- Action / Outreach.
- Sacred Space / Music.
- Diversity of beliefs / Shared values.
- Growth and learning.
- We know that the Congregation values our Minister and
all she brings to our shared ministry.
- We know that the Congregation and our Minister value
the programs offered at Channing and would like to see them expanded.
- We know that the Congregation and our Minister want Channing's
presence and activity in the wider world (outreach) to grow.
- We know that the Governing Board and leaders of key committees
feel that they do not have the time or resources to sustain
programs and outreach at their current level, let alone to provide
for the growth the Congregation desires. More resources such
as additional staff, better governance and leadership development,
more pledges, and perhaps more active members are required.
- We know that some are concerned that our community will experience
a loss of intimacy if we get too big too fast.
- Property.
- We know that the issue of repair, upkeep, and maintenance
of our property and then what to do with it / how to use it dominates
other discussions.
- We know that most people value our Sanctuary as
a sacred space and / or as a memorial and historic building that
should be preserved.
- We know that the question of maintaining our space and its
utilization appears to be a key issue within the Congregation.
- Some find the challenge of maintaining all of our buildings,
including the Sanctuary daunting and are unsure how we could
afford or how we would go about repairing and sustaining our
buildings.
- Some have advocated divesting ourselves of some of our space
to raise funds to redevelop remaining space for Congregation
use.
- A number of committees have indicated the desire or need
for more space to sustain and enrich growing programs.
- Many believe that we devote too much of our time and / or
resources to property issues.
- We know the extent of our property repair challenges
and the projected costs of repair.
- We know that there is outside support (to some degree) to repair
and sustain our Sanctuary as evidenced by the $272,000 in grants we
received this year. We also know that we could be eligible for more
grants especially if we demonstrate commitment to sustaining our Sanctuary
(although to what extent is unknown).
- We know that many different possibilities exist for our property
and space, such as those identified in the Presidents' Task Force report
as well as many creative ideas voiced in our Focus Discussions.
- We know that addressing our property challenges is financially
feasible but will require a long-term commitment of time, energy, and
financial resources (a combination of the Congregation's and the larger
community's).
- Per the On-site / Insight Capital Needs Assessment, a strategy
implemented over 20 years would likely be required.
- Financing would
likely come from some combination of loans (repaid over the 20-year
period) or selling of assets, a capital campaign drive, and outside
grants.
- Some means of managing the implementation strategy would
be needed; perhaps by establishing a separate foundation as Touro
Synagogue has done.
Year of Decision - Questions
We Need to Answer to Craft Our Vision
- Ministry. Given the Congregation's expressed desire
to expand our programs, expand our community outreach and sustain our
shared ministry into the future,
- Should we commit to increase the number of staff, the hours of
our staff, and / or the pay of our staff (to ensure consistency
with UUA guidelines) to assist in managing growing programs, and
empower the Governing Board to develop and implement a strategy
to meet this commitment in a measured fashion over a number of
year? Why or why not?
- Should we commit to increase the amount
of space available to the Congregation in some way, and empower
the Governing Board to develop a strategy for more efficient space
utilization using the best recommendations available? Why or why
not?
- Should we commit to increase the resource base of our community
by increasing the number of members and / or pledges to pay for
I.A and I.B, and empower the Governing Board to develop and implement
a strategy to meet this commitment in a measured fashion over a
number of years? Why or why not?
- Property. Given that our property challenges are
significant but that there are feasible solutions that will require
time and resources,
- Should we commit to remain at our current site in
Newport, RI and to restore our Sanctuary (including the steeple)
as our spiritual home?
- If the answer to II.A is yes, should we empower
the Governing Board to develop a plan to restore our Sanctuary
and develop our remaining property in such a way that it provides
the Congregation with sufficient program space while leveraging
the value of our property assets to assist in securing needed capital?
- If
the answer to II.B is yes, do we, as a Congregation, commit to
implementing this plan as a community over a period of up to 20
years?
- If the answer to II.A or II.B is no, what do you recommend?"
|